What Is No Poaching Agreement

McDonald’s USA, LLC (N.D. Ill. 2017); Ion c. Pizza Hut, LLC (E.D. Tex. 2017); Frost c. LG Electronics, Inc. (N.D. Cal.

2018); Butler c. Jimmy John’s Franchise, LLC, et al. (S.D. Ill. 2018); Yi c. SK Bakeries, LLC, et al. (W.D. Wash. 2018); Ogden c. Little Caesars Enterprises, Inc., et al.

(E.D. Mich. 2018); Michel c. Restaurant Brands Int’l Inc., et al. (S.D. Fla. 2018); Avery c. Albany Shaker Donuts LLC, et al.

(S.D.N.Y. 2018); Newbauer c. Jackson Hewitt Tax Services, Inc. (E.D. Vir.); In bezug: H&R Block Employee Antitrust Litigation (MDL – N.D. Ill.); In re: Railway Industry Employee No-Poach Antitrust Litigation (MDL – W.D. Pa). Diese Klagen behaupten im Allgemeinen, dass No-Poaching-Klauseln in Franchise-Verträgen gegen den Sherman Act und den Clayton Act als rechtswidrige Beschränkung des Arbeitshandels verstoßen.

La fin de l’attaque contre les accords de non-braconnage est-elle donc en vue ? La réponse courte est : « Probablement pas. In recent weeks, for example, the Justice Department has filed position statements in five ongoing civil lawsuits filed by employees of fast-food franchises against their employers to challenge non-poaching agreements in federal courts in North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Washington. All signs point to a steady increase in private investigations, lawsuits and class action lawsuits not only against companies in the technology, fast food and restaurant sectors, but also in the healthcare, higher education, insurance, tax preparation, auto repair, fitness and wellness, as well as against other franchised companies that have entered into non-hiring, non-recruitment or non-solicitation agreements between them. .

Comments are closed.


  • Brak kategorii